Does The ‘Election Integrity Legislation’ Really Do Anything?

Published by The Liberty Block on

By Regina Barnes for The Liberty Block

Let us briefly discuss the 2022 state senate’s attempt at Constitutional Amendment Concurrent Resolution (CACR) 36 – residency for the purpose of voting. Providing that only residents of the state may vote in elections.

The fact that any republican who has read and understands the state constitution would put their name as a sponsor to this type of constitutional amendment is very concerning.  

I would argue this proposed amendment bill was most likely tabled because the state senate realized it would not get past the house.  

The term “resident” refers to someone who resides, such as a college student. “Resident” is not mentioned in the state constitution, Article 11. It refers to only an “inhabitant” in regard to voting.  An amendment such as CACR 36, to include “resident” is a mere political move and has nothing to do with election integrity. It would actually create more fraud. 

This is a good example of why all the current NH republican senators, named below, need to go with the Democrats:

       Erin Hennessey

       Bob Guida 

       Jeb Bradley

       James Gray

       Harold French

       Ruth Ward

       Denise Ricciardi

       Gary Daniels

       Kevin Avard

       Sharon Carson

       John Reagan

       Regina Birdsell 

       Chuck Morse

       Bill Gannon 

These guys play for the politics of it all and not for the people. We need PROVEN PATRIOTS IN OFFICE.

This article does not necessarily reflect the opinions of The Liberty Block or any of its members. We welcome all forms of serious feedback and debate. 

Post Views: 867
Categories: Opinion
Tags:

Related Posts

Opinion

Alu’s Breakdown of Chiaverini v. Napoleon

While blockbuster cases like Garland v. Cargill (bump stock ban), U.S. v. Rahimi (restraining orders & gun control), FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine (abortion pill), Murthy v. Missouri (censorship) and Trump v. U.S. (immunity) are making all the headlines, another recent decision by the Supreme Court caught my attention due to my interest in due process and government accountability.

Opinion

Alu’s Breakdown of the U.S. v. Rahimi Supreme Court Decision

At long last, the SCOTUS has published their decision in U.S. v. Rahimi. The case arose from a conviction of a Texas man named Zackey Rahimi, who was found guilty of violating a federal law. Specifically, Rahimi violated 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(8), which prohibits the possession of firearms by anyone who is the subject of a domestic violence restraining order. Interestingly, the restraining orders are issued by state courts, while the law in question is federal.

Opinion

Zephan’s Bitcoin Sermon – April

This sermon is made in honor of the holy sacrament of 4/20. In the Torah, God said in the context of creating the world for man, “See, I give you every seed-bearing plant that is upon all the earth, and every tree that has seed-bearing fruit; they shall be yours for food.” Genesis 1:29. When God created this holy proclamation to humanity, he was, of course, aware that he had given humanity cannabis, psilocybin, opiates, alcohol, and other plants or plant-derived substances that would change the human consciousness from its default state.