The Conservatarian Exchange Podcast #198

Published by The Liberty Block on

This week’s (March 20) show topics included:

Chuck Schumer’s statement on Netanyahu and elections in Israel; Trump’s statements on Jews and democrats; Extremely high fines against Trump and his appeal; should Trump fight harder and more publicly/be more provocative; Fani Willis and Nathan Wade and the judge’s ruling regarding disqualification.

We invite feedback, questions, and comments from our live and podcast listeners, either through comments on Facebook live during the show or by email to: theconservatarianexchange@libertyblock.com

Thank you to our great sponsors: LocalSilverMint.com and ThroughLiberty.com.

Post Views: 306
Categories: Podcast
Tags:

Related Posts

Podcast

The Conservatarian Exchange Podcast #205

Steve attends his youngest son's law school graduation, so Mike hosts the show with the Eds and Meagan. They discuss the insanity of the ongoing Trump trials, Rashida Tlaib and the pro-Hamas members of Congress, and much more!

Podcast

The Conservatarian Exchange Podcast #204

Noem’s shooting-her-dog story; is this just another ghost-written book and it doesn’t matter what the book says; who should Trump pick for VP? Noem has no backbone after capitulating to the NCAA on women’s sports; for what reason did Trump meet with Desantis? Did he think he needs help from Desantis? Should Trump select his son, Don, for VP? Tulsi Gabbard? The protest on college campus supporting Hamas; is it all funded ultimately by the CCP? Is it unusual to have this chaos when a republican is in office?

Podcast

The Conservatarian Exchange Podcast #203

It's Passover, so Steven was unavailable; Alu seizes the opportunity for a hostile takeover of the podcast and begins throwing AnCap bombs from the first moment! The crew gets into a heated debate about whether the government should ever interfere with private contracts and whether discrimination should ever be outlawed; four different opinions emerge, and many brilliant points are made; the Eds seem to argue that the government is necessarily a party to all contracts.